Profitability Trends

When you are looking at your scoreboard, remember that industry average benchmarks and single points in time only tell part of the story.

D. Brown Management Profile Picture
Share

When you are looking at your scoreboard, remember that industry average benchmarks and single points in time only tell part of the story.

Scoreboard: Invoice and Graph representing Company Profitability and Trends.

Just like physical training, what really matters for your personal health is that you are consistently improving.

  • Graph your key metrics over the last five years and look for relationships.
      
  • Analyze your data and look for outliers to help the trends make more sense. For example, did you have one super good or bad job in a year that completely skewed the metrics?

  • Be cautious not to over-rationalize “outliers.” If you have a bad job every year, remember that is more likely to be part of the trend rather than due to an outlier. For example, Motorola had something like 24 consecutive quarters of “one-time” expenses. If they occur that consistently, they are regular expenses and not one-time expenses. Also, Motorola is no longer around. 
     
  • What do those metric trends look like if you project them another 2-3 years into the future?

  • Which metrics are trending in the right direction?  

  • Which metrics can you improve?  How?  


Want to talk about it? Contact us for a conversation.




Competition - What Do You Really Know?
Contractors typically pay too much or too little attention to their competition. The best contractors strike the right balance spending most of their time focused on customers while being deliberate in knowing their competition.
Project Delivery - Lease Leaseback
Project Owners typically manage the financing of the project. In certain circumstances this does not always make sense, which is where Lease-Leaseback or Build-to-Suit project delivery methods come in.
CFMA: Effective Interviewing Processes
As part of the talent diagnostics luncheon, 83% of the group identified a lack of qualified candidates. Only 35% self-rated their interviewing process as “Very Effective,” while many cited lack of time to effectively manage the process.